Ichabod Crane Still Haunts My Brain: Pedagogical Thoughts about Sleepy Hollow’s Connecticut Yankee

AI Generated in WordPress

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

BY TRACY HOFFMAN

Over the weekend and into this week, I’ve continued thinking about Ichabod Crane as a teacher and ghost.

These ruminations have blended with concerns about A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens since the beautiful building, which comprises my 85-degree office, will soon be turned into a haunted-house-of-sorts for Scrooge’s ghosts. I will most certainly get around to writing about the impending mayhem in future blogs. Suffice it to say for today, my Ichabod thoughts have been tainted by a foreboding sense of Charles Dickens.

My mental image of Ichabod Crane coexists with pictures of the Dickens’ character Uriah Heep from David Copperfield. Physically, they look the same in my mind’s eye, even though I realize Ichabod is a much livelier character than Uriah. But let me stop myself from going further into the Dickens rabbit hole. (If you want to jump into Elizabeth Bradley’s article, “Dickens and Irving: A Tale of Two Christmas Tales,” you’ll be ready for my future conversations as we get closer to December.)

The big research questions I pose today are:

  1. Is Ichabod Crane the first Connecticut Yankee Pedagogue Ghost in American Literature?
  2. Is Ichabod Crane the first Connecticut Yankee Ghost in American Literature?
  3. Is Ichabod Crane the first Connecticut Yankee Teacher in American Literature?

I think we know the answers to all these questions. American Literature isn’t necessary. Where else would we see a Connecticut Yankee? Yes, of course, he would be the first in all three categories. The first two questions/descriptions are so bizarre and specific, I can’t imagine another character fulfilling them. But my last question has me thinking.

Yes, I believe Ichabod Crane is our first Connecticut Yankee who teaches. But why, in the development of the Connecticut Yankee, did Irving choose to make him a teacher?  

Ichabod Crane balances between the Jonathan character of Royal Tyler’s The Contrast (1787) and Hank Morgan of Mark Twain’s Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court (1889). David Gamut of James Fenimore Cooper’s Last of the Mohicans (1826), appearing a short time after Irving’s character, keeps the role as a music teacher, but Hank Morgan has lost the teaching quality by 1889.

According to Gary Denis, in Sleepy Hollow: Birth of the Legend (2015), Irving transfers some of the stereotypical qualities of the Yankee onto Brom Bones and refines Ichabod’s role to make him an “educated city-slicker” instead of “the country dweller” (158). Denis points to Irving’s improvement: “Irving is thereby credited as having been the first to introduce a conflict between East and West, the refined and cultured Connecticut Yankee vs. the rough-hewn frontiersman” (158).

But I’m still left with—Why? Why did Irving choose a teacher for Ichabod’s profession? We know that the minister and Ichabod Crane are the two most educated fellows in Sleepy Hollow, so I understand the options were limited.

We can study Jesse Merwin, Irving’s teacher friend who inspired the character. And we can consider Ichabod B. Crane, the military officer and inspiration for Ichabod’s name. With more research to investigate, I’ll close the blog out for now. My quest to understand Ichabod Crane, the pedagogue, continues.

Today, my students are reading “The Devil and Tom Walker,” and I can see Dickens borrowing heavily from Irving’s story to benefit his own Christmas Carol, so my blog next Wednesday could easily collapse into my own Dickens’ nightmares.

Washington Irving Wednesdays Are Back!

Image created in WordPress AI

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

BY TRACY HOFFMAN

In the spring, a friend asked me, “Are you still doing your weekly blogs?” I said no, but had fantastic excuses why I haven’t kept up the ritual: I’ve posted guest and student blogs, we have plenty of content on the website, I’ve been busy with other work, I’ve been dealing with family issues, etc. Of course, the pathetic response I gave to my friend has been eating at me all summer.

At least for this school year, from now until May 2026, I’m committed to giving my Wednesdays back to Washington Irving. It may take me until 11:59 p.m. somewhere on the planet, and like my daily workouts, some blogs may be rushed and brief, but I will show up to publish something on the website.

If we have a student or guest blogger, I can set them up on Wednesday, but post on a day other than Washington Irving Wednesday, so please keep those coming, if you are so inclined.

The teaching of Irving’s texts, especially “Rip Van Winkle” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” will probably be the subject of my next blogs for five main reasons:

  1. I’m currently teaching an undergraduate class on Washington Irving.
  2. People often email to ask for Irving teaching material, especially for “Rip Van Winkle” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow.”
  3. It’s my understanding that Irving biographer Andrew Burstein has taught a course solely devoted to Washington Irving. I’d love to connect with others who have done the same. Perhaps we can unite our efforts in helping instructors who need teaching materials.
  4. In October, I’m giving a paper on Washington Irving and Pedagogy for a conference.
  5. I’m giving such a paper, and put together a pedagogy and literature panel, because my university, as of late, wants me to be an international superstar of pedagogy.

In part, I hope my blogging can help me work through ideas about the study of teaching Washington Irving–on a local, national, and international stage—to make a significant enough contribution to pacify my university’s “powers that be.”  

Those who know me well recognize how much I hate having my picture taken and have no interest whatsoever in being recognized internationally as a star of anything. But I will play the game.

I gave up the rigorous study of pedagogy decades ago, after taking a handful of graduate classes in a College of Education. I appreciated, and still appreciate, the foundation I received in the theory of education, but chose a different path—to pursue literary studies, which brought me to Washington Irving.

My university has been kind to me, allowing me the freedom for many years to focus my attention on Washington Irving, but I’m being lassoed a bit with pedagogy restraints.

With these initial thoughts in mind, on this renewed Washington Irving Wednesday, I ask you to please like or dislike, comment in kind or unkind, to any upcoming content creation from me, since my academic career now demands such responses. I thank you in advance, and I have a hunch this shift in academia may benefit the Washington Irving Society more than I realize. I trust the work ahead of me will be a “win-win” situation for me, the university, and Irving scholarship.